[izpack-users] IzPack 3.9.0-M1 is there!
Klaus.Bartz at coi.de
Fri Sep 8 10:56:11 CEST 2006
bzip2 compression is a little bit slow, I know. The difference
between raw and deflate is not so big. The full build process of
IzPack on my box
raw 40 sec deflate 45 sec bzip2 165 sec
I think "deflate" will be the best in development mode.
>From: izpack-users-bounces at lists.berlios.de
>[mailto:izpack-users-bounces at lists.berlios.de]On Behalf Of Julien Ponge
>Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:23 AM
>To: izpack-users at lists.berlios.de
>Subject: Re: [izpack-users] IzPack 3.9.0-M1 is there!
>> is there any reason to use compression format "raw" (no compress)
>> for the packs (changed in build.xml five month ago) ?
>> If not, I can change it. Check in in branch-3.9 and trunk, or?
>I will fix that before M2. It had been switched to raw five
>months ago because
>in development mode, it significantly speeds up the installer
>packaging. I will
>restore bzip2 starting from M2.
>As for the commit policy is concerned, we commit fixes to
>branch-3.9, and merge
>back to trunk. If people have new features, they must go in
>trunk from now.
>That's just good old branches managing ;-)
>izpack-users mailing list
>izpack-users at lists.berlios.de
More information about the izpack-users