[izpack-users] Feature Request - Scripting Languages for custom actions

Matthew Inger mattinger at gmail.com
Fri Jan 4 19:00:42 CET 2008

I hand't given too much thought into make it generic, though from a user
standpoint, I believe
it could be generic as proposed above.  However, from a coding standpoint, I
think the implementations
will be disjoint, as jsr 223 does not show up until java 6.  In theory the
"Invocable" interface would
be the way to go, but we can't guarantee it's existance.

I'll look into it a little more.  As far as panel building, I hadn't even
thought along those routes yet.

On Jan 2, 2008 7:22 AM, Julien Ponge <julien.ponge at gmail.com> wrote:

> > I sent this to the list earlier, but it somehow didn't make it
> > through.  You'll find more information on BSF at
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf
> Yep, BSF is a good bet since we cannot expect everybody to be on Java 6.
> Matthew, do you envision allowing Groovy to build panels as well? That
> would be terrific ;-)
> Finally I would add that Groovy plays nice when compiled to bytecode
> (but it stills requires the runtime).
> _______________________________________________
> izpack-users mailing list
> izpack-users at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/izpack-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/izpack-users/attachments/20080104/a828cc99/attachment.html 

More information about the izpack-users mailing list