[izpack-devel] IzPack 3.9.0 released!

[Alistair Bush]

Hi Tino,

I would say otherwise. :)
below the misc header from http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki#Misc.
are some resources as to why gentoo compiles from source.

For izpack to become available within the gentoo overlays (and eventually
the official tree) It will need to be built from source. I want izpack to be
in the tree.

Just some questions about having nanoxml included within the sourcecode,
what was the motivation? what version is it? (does anyone even remember what
version it was) has it been modified or had security/bug patches/fixes
applied?


Alistair

On 9/26/06, Tino Schwarze <berlios.de at tisc.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:21:43PM +1200, Alistair Bush wrote:
>
> > As ppl might remember im attempting to package izpack for gentoo
> linux.   One
> > of your dependancies is metouia.jar.  Sadly this project seems to no
> longer
> > be maintained and as a result I am finding it difficult to retrieve the
> > sourcecode for it.
> >
> > Would anyone have this code and if not, what role does metouia.jar play
> (is it
> > a optional extra/theming plugin.  Or is it a required dependancy).
>
> I'd say: Don't overdo it! I don't think it is a good idea to split up
> IzPack into it's depencies. It might introduce a lot of trouble and
> basically gains nothing. (E.g. we're using NanoXML, but an older version
> and the source is part of the IzPack source.)
>
> Tino.
>
> _______________________________________________
> izpack-devel mailing list
> izpack-devel at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/izpack-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/izpack-devel/attachments/20060927/5710388f/attachment.html