[izpack-devel] Distrubuted install.xml files ...
Hans Aikema
aikebah at aikebah.net
Mon Apr 23 23:44:42 CEST 2007
While testing this patch by using an updated IzPack-install.xml
(seperating the Documentation and nanoXML documentation to seperate
specifications I encountered some issues I'd like to discuss with the list.
Using distributed package-definitions by the refpack enhancement
contributed by Syed Khadeer showed an (IMHO) unwanted sequence-dependecy
between the resources and the pack-definitions in the
installer-specification. (i.e. if you change the sequence of packs
without adopting the sequencenumber suffix of the ImgPacksPanel.img.<n>
of the packs you will get incorrect icons in the ImgPacksPanel for the
packs)
I have currently 2 alternatives in mind:
1) Specify the id-suffix for the wanted image-resource on the
pack-definition (create a new optional attribute (required when using
ImgPacksPanel) packIconId on the pack-tag.
2) Use the pack name as the Id-suffix instead of a sequence-number
Either choice would mean adaptation of the ImgPacksPanel (both
image-selection code and image preloading code) in a similar manner.
Besides that I think that at least the resources-section should also be
processed for refpack (so that the pack and it's icon can be defined in
a single xml-definition).
I can do these changes, but I'd like to here fellow developers' opinions
on these matters first. So please respond regarding the following issues:
- do you agree on changing the id's for the pack's icon resource and if
so which of the 2 alternatives is the best
- should resources be processed from the refpack xml-file as well?
- should anything else also be specifiable (and thus processed) from the
refpack xml-file?
regards,
Hans Aikema
Julien Ponge wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
>> (willing to look into it if no-one else has time available)
>>
>
> Thanks a lot for reminding me, it had indeed slowly got into the lower
> parts of the todo stack :-(
>
> I agree if you want to handle this patch and eventually merge it to the trunk!
>
> Thanks a lot
> _______________________________________________
> izpack-devel mailing list
> izpack-devel at lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/izpack-devel
>
>
More information about the izpack-devel
mailing list