[izpack-users] Having install.jar independant from packages content
Bartz, Klaus
Klaus.Bartz at coi.de
Wed Oct 11 13:57:38 CEST 2006
Hi Frederic,
I think it is not possible in the moment.
We build our installations (the biggest has ~ 400 MB) every night
with an automated ant task. Needs ~ 15 minutes on a 2G win box.
To change the behavior needs changes at more than one place of
IzPack. I assume some time will be needed for implementation.
For me there are more important things todo in IzPack. I need
e.g. maintenance but have not had the time to implement it in the lastg
one or two years.
Cheers
Klaus
>-----Original Message-----
>From: izpack-users-bounces at lists.berlios.de
>[mailto:izpack-users-bounces at lists.berlios.de]On Behalf Of Frederic
>Lapeyre
>Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:32 PM
>To: izpack-users at lists.berlios.de
>Subject: [izpack-users] Having install.jar independant from packages
>content
>
>
>Hello,
>
>I am a new IzPack user and really like it!
>
>I have a need that I cannot find covered by the current IzPack
>functionalities: to install packs dynamically without the need to
>recompile the install.jar file when packs change.
>
>Why? Because I have frequent update to the content of the
>packages and they
>are quite large files. So I was thinking that if I have both
>the "web" and
>the "loose" functionality combined, that would seem to work perfectly.
>Without the loose option, install.jar would have to be
>recompiled every time
>a package changes. And without the web option, users would
>have to download
>the installer and the packages rather than just the installer,
>which defeats
>the purpose of having an installer!
>
>Overall, I am looking for an installer that would dowload
>selected zipped packages to the user and run the shells to unzip them
>*without having to recompile the installer*.
>
>There is a related need on this: when downloading a file, I
>get the "internet
>connection window" but would rather have the "x% download of
>pack xxxx in
>progress".
>
>Maybe someone can help me with this using the current IzPack
>as is in case I
>have missed something, or else someone might have an idea about how to
>develop this.
>
>Thanks for your help,
>
>Frederic
>_______________________________________________
>izpack-users mailing list
>izpack-users at lists.berlios.de
>https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/izpack-users
>
More information about the izpack-users
mailing list