[izpack-devel] Adding XInclude support
julien.ponge at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 09:14:38 CET 2007
> a) Is a change like this likely to be accepted?
Yes, although XInclude may be too big for the task, and ...
> b) namespace support seems really limited in nanoxml when used in IzPack. I'm not seeing any. Am I missing something?
... nanoxml doesn't indeed support namespaces.
> c) Is it preferable to make changes to the nanoxml packages or the izPack packages. I'm asking because it makes little difference to the
> code and many people prefer to keep third party source as original as possible.
NanoXML is not developed anymore, so you can make changes there if you
want. The thing is to make it lightweight enough.
Or maybe a <include (...)> style tag would be just enough?
More information about the izpack-devel