[izpack-devel] Updating to latest version of NanoXML
julien.ponge at gmail.com
Sun Jan 7 19:58:00 CET 2007
> I understand why NanoXML was used in the first place, but the original
> restrictions do not exist any more. So if we are at a point where a code
> upgrade around XML parsing is required, why not go all the way and use the
> XML parser provided with the Java API?
If we had to change that, it would indeed make sense to use javax.xml.*
The big question is of course "do we really need to change that?". The
thing is that NanoXML is strongly-coupled in some parts of the
Any volunteer to evaluate such a change impacts?
More information about the izpack-devel